Many of these places contain China, Singapore and the US. These economies seek to determine accounting criteria for cryptocurrencies, mostly in order to handle income laundering and scam, that have been made more challenging due to the crypto-technology. However, most regulators do recognise that there appears to be no real gain to fully banning cryptocurrencies as a result Yield on Crypto of financial flows they hold along.
Also, probably because it is almost impossible to turn off the crypto-world for so long as the web exists. Regulators can just only focus on areas wherever they might be able to exercise some control, which seems to be wherever cryptocurrencies meet fiat currencies (i.e. the cryptocurrency exchanges).
While cryptocurrencies seem ahead under more scrutiny as time advances, such activities do benefit some nations like Hong Kong. Because the Asian ICO ban, several pioneers of cryptocurrency jobs have been driven from the mainland to the city. Aurelian Menant, CEO of Gatecoin, said that the business received « a lot of inquiries from blockchain challenge founders based in the mainland » and that there has been an observable spike in how many Chinese customers registering on the platform.
Seeking somewhat more, organizations like Nvidia have indicated positivity from the event. They claim that this ICO bar is only going to gasoline their GPU income, because the ban will more than likely boost the need for cryptocurrency-related GPUs. With the bar, the only method to acquire cryptocurrencies mined with GPUs is to quarry them with processing power. Therefore,
individuals seeking to acquire cryptocurrencies in China will have to acquire more processing energy, as opposed to making right purchases via exchanges. Essentially, Nvidia’s sentiments is that isn’t a downhill control for cryptocurrencies; actually, other industries may get a increase as well.